PFLPhysiological Fitness Landscape

Biomarkers · Coagulation

Angiopoietin-2

Lower values go with lower risk of death. No risk curve catalogued yet.

Published risk of death1.29×per 1 SD increment in serum Ang-2 (95% CI 1.19–1.39) · Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP), population-based sample, mean age 54.4 years, Germany

What studies found when this marker was changed

They describe what happened in those study groups, not a recommendation. See all catalogued interventions.

Measured changes in Angiopoietin-2, study by study

2 effects with a numeric size, each from one study arm: the dot is the reported change, the line its 95% interval where one was given. Green points move the marker the way lower risk of death lies; amber the other way. Study results in the groups studied, not predictions for a person.

Each row is one study: what was changed, the effect it reported on this marker, and the source.
TypeInterventionReported effectEvidenceSource
pharmacologicOral sildenafil every 8 hours for 15 days vs placebo in stable patients on durable left ventricular assist device supportAngiopoietin-2 changed by -5% (-11 to -4) on sildenafil vs +3% (-5 to 15) on placebo at day 15 (P = .039); twenty participantsRCTSaeed O, Patel SR, Farooq M, et al. ESC Heart Fail. 2026;13(3):xvag099.
supplementTwo oral doses of cholecalciferol 300,000 IU (baseline and week 8) vs placebo in vitamin D-deficient adults with non-diabetic CKD stage 3-4Serum angiopoietin-2 changed -0.27 ng/mL (95% CI -1.09 to 0.55) vs placebo at 16 weeks; not significant; n=120 randomisedRCTKaur J, Kamboj K, Yadav AK, et al. PLoS One. 2022;17(6):e0268946.

What else moves this marker

They describe those study groups, not an individual, and an association is not a cause.

Diseases and conditions

Each row is one study: what it compared and the change it reported in this marker.
WhatEffect on the markerComparison · populationSource
↑ COVID-19, critical illness · critically ill vs non-critically ill COVID-19 patients+2.388 ng/mL (95% CI 1.121 to 3.655)critically ill vs non-critically ill COVID-19 patients · Hospitalised COVID-19 patients, 27 studiesmeta analysis · PMID 34702152
↑ COVID-19, poor outcome · patients with poor outcome vs good outcomeSMD +1.06 (95% CI 0.6 to 1.51)poor vs good outcome, COVID-19 patients · COVID-19 patients, 74 studiesmeta analysis · PMID 36943015
↑ Lung cancer with lymph node metastasis · serum Ang-2 in lung cancer patients with vs without lymph node metastasisSMD +1.06 (95% CI 0.57 to 1.56)lymph node metastasis vs no metastasis, lung cancer patients · Lung cancer patients, 20 studiesmeta analysis · PMID 28906403

Genetic predisposition

Each row is one study: what it compared and the change it reported in this marker.
WhatEffect on the markerComparison · populationSource
↕ MCPH1 rs2442517 and ABO rs8176746 (top GWAS loci) · proportion of inter-individual variation in circulating Ang-2 explained by top genetic loci+1.7%variance explained by top loci · Framingham Heart Study participants (replication in SHIP, n=3184)gwas · PMID 25552591