PFLPhysiological Fitness Landscape

Biomarkers · Renal & Purine

Serum Creatinine

Both low and high values go with higher risk of death. In NHANES 1999–2018 with linked mortality to 2019, each standard deviation above average goes with 25% higher risk of death. Risk rises at both ends: not comparable

Serum Creatinine and risk of death

Published curve higher than the NHANES fitNHANES fit higher

Risk of death from our NHANES fit, relative to its reference value. The dotted vertical line marks the NHANES median.

Risk of death per SD (NHANES)1.25×95% CI 1.22–1.28 · 43,817 adults, 5,903 deaths
Value of the measurement+0.022gain in concordance within age bands; rank 16 of 56 · all tests
Across studies, risk per SD1.25×NHANES 1.25 [1.22–1.28] · CRELES 1.27 [1.16–1.39]

Serum Creatinine across cohorts

11.11.25HR per SD (95% CI)
NHANES · United States, 20–8443,817 people · 5,903 deaths1.25 1.22–1.28
CRELES · Costa Rica, 60+2,501 people · 478 deaths1.27 1.16–1.39
Risk-of-death ratio per standard deviation, adjusted for age and sex, within each cohort. Cohorts differ in age range, assay, measurement protocol and follow-up, and one SD is a different amount in each, so the comparison is of direction and rough size per SD, not per unit. Vertical line: no association.

Serum Creatinine by age and sex

Each bar runs from the 5th to the 95th percentile, the darker part from the 25th to the 75th, and the tick is the median. Not a reference range or a target.

The percentiles as a table
Each row is one sex and age band: the values below which 5%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 95% of people fall (mg/dL), from the survey named in the row. Not a reference range or a target.
SexAge5th25thMedian75th95thnCycle / source
All20-390.570.700.830.941.161,431NHANES 2017-2018
All40-590.570.700.830.991.211,548NHANES 2017-2018
All60+0.600.770.921.071.391,890NHANES 2017-2018
Allall0.570.720.851.001.254,869NHANES 2017-2018
Men20-390.740.850.931.041.22684NHANES 2017-2018
Men40-590.710.850.961.071.29723NHANES 2017-2018
Men60+0.730.891.011.161.53958NHANES 2017-2018
Menall0.730.860.961.091.352,365NHANES 2017-2018
Women20-390.520.630.700.790.93747NHANES 2017-2018
Women40-590.530.640.720.810.98825NHANES 2017-2018
Women60+0.570.700.820.961.28932NHANES 2017-2018
Womenall0.540.650.740.841.082,504NHANES 2017-2018

What studies found when this marker was changed

They describe what happened in those study groups, not a recommendation. See all catalogued interventions.

Measured changes in Serum Creatinine, study by study

3 effects with a numeric size, each from one study arm: the dot is the reported change, the line its 95% interval where one was given. Study results in the groups studied, not predictions for a person.

Each row is one study: what was changed, the effect it reported on this marker, and the source.
TypeInterventionReported effectEvidenceSource
clinicalHypertonic saline solution co-administered with intravenous furosemide in acute decompensated heart failureSerum creatinine -0.46 mg/dL (95% CI -0.51 to -0.41) vs furosemide alonemeta-analysisLiu C, Peng Z, Gao X, et al. Crit Care Med. 2021.
lifestyleIncreased fluid intake (2-3 L/night during daytime fasting)Drinking 2 to 3 L fluid overnight kept serum creatinine significantly lower than controls during Ramadan fasting (P <.05; effect size not reported)RCTTarabeih M, et al. Increasing Overnight Fluid Intake and Kidney Function During…
pharmacologicSGLT2 inhibitors (e.g. Empagliflozin)Empagliflozin slowed chronic annual eGFR decline by 64% (95% CI 59-69) and cut risk of a >=50% serum creatinine rise by 20% vs placebometa-analysisHerrington WG, et al. Effects of empagliflozin on conventional and exploratory…
pharmacologicSGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin in type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular riskDoubling of serum creatinine in 1.5% vs 2.6% with placebo, a relative risk reduction of 44%RCTWanner C, et al. Empagliflozin and Progression of Kidney Disease in Type 2…
pharmacologicAngiotensin receptor blocker (losartan) for intraglomerular pressure controlLosartan reduced the risk of doubling of serum creatinine by 25 percent vs placebo (P=0.006)RCTBrenner BM, et al. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:861-869.
pharmacologicACE inhibitor or ARB therapy vs symptomatic treatment in IgA nephropathySerum creatinine -9.37 µmol/L (95% CI -71.95 to -6.80) vs symptomatic treatmentmeta-analysisTunnicliffe DJ, Reid S, Craig JC, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024.

Things that worsen it

Each row is one study: what was changed, the effect it reported on this marker, and the source.
TypeCondition or exposureReported effectEvidenceSource
clinicalDehydration and volume depletion (daytime fluid abstinence)Fasting-related dehydration raised serum creatinine and urea vs hydrated group; highest during Ramadan (P <.05; effect size not reported)RCTTarabeih M, et al. Increasing Overnight Fluid Intake and Kidney Function During…
clinicalVenovenous ultrafiltration vs stepped pharmacologic diuretic therapy in acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal functionSerum creatinine +0.23 mg/dL at 96 h with ultrafiltration vs -0.04 mg/dL with pharmacologic therapyRCTBart BA, Goldsmith SR, Lee KL, et al. N Engl J Med. 2012.
pharmacologicHigh-dose chronic NSAID use (Ibuprofen / Naproxen / Meloxicam)NSAID inhibition of renal prostaglandins can cause acute renal dysfunction, especially with reduced renal perfusion (effect size not reported)reviewWhelton A. Nephrotoxicity of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: physiologic…

What else moves this marker

They describe those study groups, not an individual, and an association is not a cause.

Diseases and conditions

Each row is one study: what it compared and the change it reported in this marker.
WhatEffect on the markerComparison · populationSource
↓ Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis · ALS patients vs controlsSMD -0.78 (95% CI -0.97 to -0.6)ALS patients vs controls · Patients with ALS and controls in 5 of the included studiesmeta analysis · PMID 32564621