PFLPhysiological Fitness Landscape

Biomarkers · Bone & Mineral

Parathyroid Hormone (PTH)

Lower values go with lower risk of death. Not measured in our NHANES panel. The curve is drawn from the published study (source below).

PTH and risk of death

Published curve higher than the NHANES fitNHANES fit higher

Risk of death relative to the curve's reference value, drawn from the published study (source below).

Published risk of death1.19×highest vs lowest PTH concentration (95% CI 1.08–1.30) · Meta-analysis of 10 prospective studies (31,616 subjects), general population

PTH by age and sex

Each bar runs from the 5th to the 95th percentile, the darker part from the 25th to the 75th, and the tick is the median. Not a reference range or a target.

The percentiles as a table
Each row is one sex and age band: the values below which 5%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 95% of people fall (pg/mL), from the survey named in the row. Not a reference range or a target.
SexAge5th25thMedian75th95thnCycle / source
All20-3917.027.035.045.069.01,394NHANES 2005-2006
All40-5922.031.040.052.075.01,372NHANES 2005-2006
All60+23.035.046.061.01071,403NHANES 2005-2006
Allall20.030.039.051.080.04,169NHANES 2005-2006
Men20-3917.026.033.042.067.9740NHANES 2005-2006
Men40-5922.031.039.051.074.0679NHANES 2005-2006
Men60+22.034.046.061.0107733NHANES 2005-2006
Menall19.029.038.049.077.02,152NHANES 2005-2006
Women20-3918.028.037.047.070.0654NHANES 2005-2006
Women40-5921.031.041.053.076.0693NHANES 2005-2006
Women60+23.036.046.061.1105670NHANES 2005-2006
Womenall20.531.041.053.083.02,017NHANES 2005-2006

What studies found when this marker was changed

They describe what happened in those study groups, not a recommendation. See all catalogued interventions.

Measured changes in PTH, study by study

6 effects with a numeric size, each from one study arm: the dot is the reported change, the line its 95% interval where one was given. Green points move the marker the way lower risk of death lies; amber the other way. Study results in the groups studied, not predictions for a person.

Each row is one study: what was changed, the effect it reported on this marker, and the source.
TypeInterventionReported effectEvidenceSource
pharmacologicLong-term lithium treatment in patients with mood disordersLithium treatment associated with parathyroid hormone higher by 7.32 pg/mL (95% CI 3.42-11.23) and calcium +0.09 mmol/Lmeta-analysisMcKnight RF, Adida M, Budge K, et al. Lithium toxicity profile: a systematic…
pharmacologicVitamin D compounds vs placebo in people with chronic kidney disease not requiring dialysisSerum PTH fell 49.34 pg/mL (95% CI -85.70 to -12.97) vs placebo; 4 trials, n=153; duration not statedmeta-analysisPalmer SC, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(4):CD008175.
pharmacologicCinacalcet added to standard therapy vs placebo or no treatment in CKD with secondary hyperparathyroidismSerum PTH fell 281.39 pg/mL (95% CI -325.84 to -234.94) vs control; duration not statedmeta-analysisBallinger AE, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(12):CD006254.
pharmacologicLifestyle therapy, Metformin Hydrochloride vs lifestyle therapy plus placebo for 6 months: Diet and Exercise Plus Metformin to Treat Frailty in Obese SeniorsChange in Serum Parathyroid Hormone: +6 pg/mL (95% CI -8.2 to 15.8) vs lifestyle therapy plus placebo at 6 months (posted between-group difference, n=114)RCTVA Office of Research and Development. Diet and Exercise Plus Metformin to…
supplementOral vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) supplementation vs control in adults, meta-analysis of RCTsSerum PTH fell 12.77 pg/mL (95% CI -20.03 to -5.51) vs control; 26 articles; duration not statedmeta-analysisLai J, et al. Nutr Rev. 2026;84(3):571-583.
supplementModerate-dose oral vitamin D (3200 IU/day) vs placebo in adults with obesity undergoing bariatric surgeryAchieved PTH was 6.60 pg/mL lower (95% CI -17.12 to 3.92) vs placebo; 1 trial, n=79; duration not statedmeta-analysisChakhtoura MT, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024;10():CD011800.

What else moves this marker

They describe those study groups, not an individual, and an association is not a cause.

Genetic predisposition

Each row is one study: what it compared and the change it reported in this marker.
WhatEffect on the markerComparison · populationSource
↑ rs6127099 upstream of CYP24A1 · per minor allele, serum PTH+7 % higher serum PTH per allele per alleleper additional copy of the rs6127099 minor allele · 29,155 participants of European ancestry from 13 cohorts (22,653 discovery, 6502 replication)gwas · PMID 27927781