PFLPhysiological Fitness Landscape

Biomarkers · Hematology

Red Blood Cell Count

Both low and high values go with higher risk of death. In NHANES 1999–2018 with linked mortality to 2019, each standard deviation above average goes with 17% lower risk of death. Risk rises at both ends: not comparable

Red Blood Cell Count and risk of death

Published curve higher than the NHANES fitNHANES fit higher

Risk of death from our NHANES fit, relative to its reference value. The dotted vertical line marks the NHANES median.

Risk of death per SD (NHANES)0.83×95% CI 0.80–0.85 · 49,105 adults, 7,188 deaths
Value of the measurement+0.020gain in concordance within age bands; rank 19 of 56 · all tests

Red Blood Cell Count by age and sex

Each bar runs from the 5th to the 95th percentile, the darker part from the 25th to the 75th, and the tick is the median. Not a reference range or a target.

The percentiles as a table
Each row is one sex and age band: the values below which 5%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 95% of people fall (10^6 cells/uL), from the survey named in the row. Not a reference range or a target.
SexAge5th25thMedian75th95thnCycle / source
All20-394.134.524.855.175.591,457NHANES 2017-2018
All40-594.114.474.775.055.511,584NHANES 2017-2018
All60+3.844.304.624.935.401,940NHANES 2017-2018
Allall4.044.434.755.075.534,981NHANES 2017-2018
Men20-394.534.925.145.345.70698NHANES 2017-2018
Men40-594.474.775.015.265.69740NHANES 2017-2018
Men60+3.904.504.795.095.53981NHANES 2017-2018
Menall4.274.745.015.275.652,419NHANES 2017-2018
Women20-393.964.314.554.775.14759NHANES 2017-2018
Women40-594.024.314.524.775.15844NHANES 2017-2018
Women60+3.794.234.504.795.17959NHANES 2017-2018
Womenall3.934.284.534.785.162,562NHANES 2017-2018

What studies found when this marker was changed

They describe what happened in those study groups, not a recommendation. See all catalogued interventions.

Measured changes in Red Blood Cell Count, study by study

1 effect with a numeric size, each from one study arm: the dot is the reported change, the line its 95% interval where one was given. Study results in the groups studied, not predictions for a person.

Each row is one study: what was changed, the effect it reported on this marker, and the source.
TypeInterventionReported effectEvidenceSource
clinicalPlatelet donation by apheresis in blood donors, change in red blood cell count (meta-analysis)Red blood cell count fell 0.21 x10^6/uL (95% CI -0.29 to -0.13) after plateletpheresis; 4 studies, 243 donors; duration not statedmeta-analysisGil-Betacur A, et al. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):19770.

What else moves this marker

They describe those study groups, not an individual, and an association is not a cause.

Diseases and conditions

Each row is one study: what it compared and the change it reported in this marker.
WhatEffect on the markerComparison · populationSource
↑ Metabolic syndrome · individuals with vs without MetSSMD +0.15 (95% CI 0.13 to 0.18)MetS vs controls · 51 articles, ~170,000 participants (observational studies and RCT baselines)meta analysis · PMID 38195797

Environmental and occupational exposures

Each row is one study: what it compared and the change it reported in this marker.
WhatEffect on the markerComparison · populationSource
↓ Alcohol consumption (genetically proxied) · per unit increase in genetically predicted alcoholic drinks per week-0.27 SD per unit increase in genetically predicted alcoholic drinks per week (95% CI -0.51 to -0.03)effect of genetically predicted drinks per week on RBC count, SD units · GWAS summary statistics (GSCAN drinks per week; blood-trait GWAS), European ancestrymendelian randomization · PMID 39236005
↓ Smoking initiation (genetically proxied) · per unit genetic liability to smoking initiation (113-SNP instrument)-0.05 SD per unit genetic liability to smoking initiation (113-SNP instrument) (95% CI -0.09 to -0.02)effect of genetically predicted smoking initiation on RBC count, SD units · GWAS summary statistics (GSCAN smoking/drinking; blood-trait GWAS), European ancestrymendelian randomization · PMID 39236005

Sources

  • NHANES curve: our Cox model adjusted for age and sex, NHANES 1999–2018 with linked mortality to 2019.

Map Red Blood Cell Count against another biomarker.

Related markers: Absolute Lymphocyte Count · Absolute Neutrophil Count · Basophil Count · Eosinophil Count · Hematocrit · Hemoglobin Concentration · Immature Reticulocyte Fraction · Lymphocyte Percentage