PFLPhysiological Fitness Landscape

Biomarkers · Hematology

Absolute Neutrophil Count

Lower values go with lower risk of death. In NHANES 1999–2018 with linked mortality to 2019, each standard deviation above average goes with 24% higher risk of death. We found the same pattern in NHANES

Absolute Neutrophil Count and risk of death

NHANES, our fit with 95% CIPublished curve

Published curve higher than the NHANES fitNHANES fit higher

Risk of death relative to each curve's own reference value, so the two curves need not cross 1 at the same point. The dotted vertical line marks the NHANES median.

Risk of death per SD (NHANES)1.24×95% CI 1.21–1.27 · 48,954 adults, 7,151 deaths
Published risk of death1.20×per 1 G/L increase of neutrophil count (95% CI 1.10–1.31) · 853 consecutive patients with neurologically asymptomatic carotid stenosis, Vienna, prospective
Value of the measurement+0.022gain in concordance within age bands; rank 17 of 56 · all tests

Absolute Neutrophil Count by age and sex

Each bar runs from the 5th to the 95th percentile, the darker part from the 25th to the 75th, and the tick is the median. Not a reference range or a target.

The percentiles as a table
Each row is one sex and age band: the values below which 5%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 95% of people fall (10^3 cells/uL), from the survey named in the row. Not a reference range or a target.
SexAge5th25thMedian75th95thnCycle / source
All20-392.063.104.105.207.301,456NHANES 2017-2018
All40-592.003.104.005.207.531,582NHANES 2017-2018
All60+2.303.204.105.207.301,939NHANES 2017-2018
Allall2.103.104.105.207.404,977NHANES 2017-2018
Men20-392.002.903.705.007.00698NHANES 2017-2018
Men40-592.103.003.905.037.26740NHANES 2017-2018
Men60+2.203.204.205.207.50981NHANES 2017-2018
Menall2.053.003.905.107.272,419NHANES 2017-2018
Women20-392.153.404.405.507.70758NHANES 2017-2018
Women40-591.903.104.105.307.70842NHANES 2017-2018
Women60+2.303.104.105.007.00958NHANES 2017-2018
Womenall2.103.204.205.307.602,558NHANES 2017-2018

What studies found when this marker was changed

They describe what happened in those study groups, not a recommendation. See all catalogued interventions.

Measured changes in Absolute Neutrophil Count, study by study

1 effect with a numeric size, each from one study arm: the dot is the reported change, the line its 95% interval where one was given. Green points move the marker the way lower risk of death lies; amber the other way. Study results in the groups studied, not predictions for a person.

Each row is one study: what was changed, the effect it reported on this marker, and the source.
TypeInterventionReported effectEvidenceSource
pharmacologicAnakinra (IL-1 receptor antagonist) for 14 days after ST-elevation myocardial infarction, neutrophil count change at 72 hAbsolute neutrophil count fell 48% from admission at 72 hours on anakinra (placebo arm fell 27%); n=64 in the anakinra armRCTDel Buono MG, et al. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):1254.

Sources

Map Absolute Neutrophil Count against another biomarker.

Related markers: Absolute Lymphocyte Count · Basophil Count · Eosinophil Count · Hematocrit · Hemoglobin Concentration · Immature Reticulocyte Fraction · Lymphocyte Percentage · Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV)