PFLPhysiological Fitness Landscape

Biomarkers · Lipids & Apolipoproteins

Total Cholesterol

Both low and high values go with higher risk of death. In NHANES 1999–2018 with linked mortality to 2019, each standard deviation above average goes with 9% lower risk of death. Risk rises at both ends: not comparable

Total Cholesterol and risk of death

NHANES, our fit with 95% CIPublished curve

Published curve higher than the NHANES fitNHANES fit higher

Risk of death relative to each curve's own reference value, so the two curves need not cross 1 at the same point. The dotted vertical line marks the NHANES median.

Risk of death per SD (NHANES)0.91×95% CI 0.89–0.94 · 48,489 adults, 7,042 deaths
Published risk of death1.07×per 39 mg/dL (1 mmol/L) increase in TC within 200-449 mg/dL (U-curve; inverse below 200… (95% CI 1.06–1.07) · 12,815,006 Korean adults with routine health examinations 2001-2004, followed until 2013
Value of the measurement+0.009gain in concordance within age bands; rank 38 of 56 · all tests
Across studies, risk per SD0.91×NHANES 0.91 [0.89–0.94] · CRELES 0.79 [0.69–0.90]

Total Cholesterol across cohorts

0.670.750.80.91HR per SD (95% CI)
NHANES · United States, 20–8448,489 people · 7,042 deaths0.91 0.89–0.94
CRELES · Costa Rica, 60+2,503 people · 479 deaths0.79 0.69–0.90
CHARLS · China, 50+7,759 people · 1,210 deaths0.94 0.86–1.03
Risk-of-death ratio per standard deviation, adjusted for age and sex, within each cohort. Cohorts differ in age range, assay, measurement protocol and follow-up, and one SD is a different amount in each, so the comparison is of direction and rough size per SD, not per unit. Vertical line: no association.

Total Cholesterol by age and sex

Each bar runs from the 5th to the 95th percentile, the darker part from the 25th to the 75th, and the tick is the median. Not a reference range or a target.

The percentiles as a table
Each row is one sex and age band: the values below which 5%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 95% of people fall (mg/dL), from the survey named in the row. Not a reference range or a target.
SexAge5th25thMedian75th95thnCycle / source
All20-391291531752002451,435NHANES 2017-2018
All40-591391731972222661,555NHANES 2017-2018
All60+1211571872162641,900NHANES 2017-2018
Allall1291611862132594,890NHANES 2017-2018
Men20-39130152177207255685NHANES 2017-2018
Men40-59131171195221259727NHANES 2017-2018
Men60+112146174202240965NHANES 2017-2018
Menall1251551812112552,377NHANES 2017-2018
Women20-39125153174195229750NHANES 2017-2018
Women40-59150176199223274828NHANES 2017-2018
Women60+131169198224281935NHANES 2017-2018
Womenall1331651882152642,513NHANES 2017-2018

What studies found when this marker was changed

They describe what happened in those study groups, not a recommendation. See all catalogued interventions.

Measured changes in Total Cholesterol, study by study

6 effects with a numeric size, each from one study arm: the dot is the reported change, the line its 95% interval where one was given. Study results in the groups studied, not predictions for a person.

Each row is one study: what was changed, the effect it reported on this marker, and the source.
TypeInterventionReported effectEvidenceSource
dietDietary soluble fiber (oat, psyllium, pectin; 2-10 g/day)Total cholesterol -0.045 mmol/L per g soluble fiber (2-10 g/d); 3 g soluble fiber from oats lowers total cholesterol by approximately 0.13 mmol/Lmeta-analysisBrown L, et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69:30-42.
dietVegetarian or vegan dietary pattern replacing an omnivorous diet in adultsTotal cholesterol -0.34 mmol/L (95% CI -0.44 to -0.23) vs omnivorous dietmeta-analysisKoch CA, Kjeldsen EW, Frikke-Schmidt R. Eur Heart J. 2023.
exerciseStructured aerobic, resistance or combined exercise training programmes vs sedentary controlTotal cholesterol -5.90 mg/dL (95% CI -8.14 to -3.65) vs sedentary controlmeta-analysisSmart NA, Downes D, van der Touw T, et al. Sports Med. 2025.
nutraceuticalPlant sterols and stanols (2 g/day)Phytosterols lowered total cholesterol (MD range -0.43 to -0.30 mmol/L) and LDL-C (-0.36 to -0.26 mmol/L) across meta-analyses of RCTsmeta-analysisZurbau A, et al. Efficacy of phytosterols for reduction of cardiometabolic risk…
pharmacologicHMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (Statins; pravastatin)Pravastatin 10-80 mg/day reduced total cholesterol by 16.1% to 23.3% (placebo-controlled RCTs)meta-analysisAdams SP, et al. Pravastatin for lowering lipids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev…
pharmacologicSemaglutide (GLP-1 receptor agonist) for at least 12 weeks in adults with type 2 diabetesTotal cholesterol -0.48 mmol/L (95% CI -0.84 to -0.11) vs placebometa-analysisYao H, Zhang A, Li D, et al. BMJ. 2024.

Things that worsen it

Each row is one study: what was changed, the effect it reported on this marker, and the source.
TypeCondition or exposureReported effectEvidenceSource
clinicalUntreated primary hypothyroidismTreating overt hypothyroidism with levothyroxine lowered total cholesterol by -58.4 mg/dL (95% CI -64.70, -52.09), reflecting elevation while untreatedmeta-analysisKotwal A, et al. Treatment of Thyroid Dysfunction and Serum Lipids: A…
dietHigh dietary saturated fatty acids (notably lauric acid) and trans fatty acidsLauric acid greatly increased total cholesterol (much of it HDL); replacing saturated or trans fats with cis unsaturated fats lowered total:HDL ratio (effect size not reported)meta-analysisMensink RP, et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77:1146-1155.

Sources

Map Total Cholesterol against another biomarker · Featured: HDL × total cholesterol.

Related markers: Apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1) · Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) · HDL Cholesterol · LDL Cholesterol · Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] · Remnant Cholesterol · Serum Triglycerides