PFLPhysiological Fitness Landscape

Biomarkers · Lipids & Apolipoproteins

Remnant Cholesterol

Lower values go with lower risk of death. Not measured in our NHANES panel. The curve is drawn from the published study (source below).

Remnant Cholesterol and risk of death

Published curve higher than the NHANES fitNHANES fit higher

Risk of death relative to the curve's reference value, drawn from the published study (source below).

Published risk of death1.60×>=1.5 mmol/L vs <0.5 mmol/L nonfasting remnant cholesterol (stepwise categories) (95% CI 1.40–1.90) · Approximately 90 000 individuals from the Danish general population, up to 22 years of follow-up

Remnant Cholesterol by age and sex

Each bar runs from the 5th to the 95th percentile, the darker part from the 25th to the 75th, and the tick is the median. Not a reference range or a target.

The percentiles as a table
Each row is one sex and age band: the values below which 5%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 95% of people fall (mmol/L), from the survey named in the row. Not a reference range or a target.
SexAge5th25thMedian75th95thnCycle / source
All20-390.260.340.440.570.91693NHANES 2017-2018
All40-590.310.390.520.680.98746NHANES 2017-2018
All60+0.340.410.520.650.88909NHANES 2017-2018
Allall0.310.390.490.650.932,348NHANES 2017-2018
Men20-390.290.360.470.590.93322NHANES 2017-2018
Men40-590.340.390.520.751.08353NHANES 2017-2018
Men60+0.340.410.540.670.87460NHANES 2017-2018
Menall0.310.390.490.670.981,135NHANES 2017-2018
Women20-390.230.340.390.570.85371NHANES 2017-2018
Women40-590.310.390.510.650.92393NHANES 2017-2018
Women60+0.320.410.520.640.88449NHANES 2017-2018
Womenall0.280.360.470.620.881,213NHANES 2017-2018

What studies found when this marker was changed

They describe what happened in those study groups, not a recommendation. See all catalogued interventions.

Measured changes in Remnant Cholesterol, study by study

3 effects with a numeric size, each from one study arm: the dot is the reported change, the line its 95% interval where one was given. Green points move the marker the way lower risk of death lies; amber the other way. Study results in the groups studied, not predictions for a person.

Each row is one study: what was changed, the effect it reported on this marker, and the source.
TypeInterventionReported effectEvidenceSource
pharmacologicPemafibrate 0.2 mg twice daily in adults with type 2 diabetes, triglycerides 200-499 mg/dL, HDL-C <=40 mg/dL on lipid-lowering therapy (PROMINENT)Remnant cholesterol 25.6% lower than placebo at 4 months (triglycerides -26.2%, apoC-III -27.6%), with no reduction in cardiovascular eventsRCTDas Pradhan A, Glynn RJ, Fruchart JC, et al. Triglyceride Lowering with…
pharmacologicLevothyroxine titrated to normalise TSH for 12 months in adults >=65 with subclinical hypothyroidism (TRUST/IEMO pooled)Remnant cholesterol -0.09 mmol/L (95% CI -0.16 to -0.01) with levothyroxine at 12 months, which the authors report as no overall effectRCTAo L, Noordam R, Trompet S, et al. Levothyroxine treatment response of…
supplementDaily Lacticaseibacillus paracasei 8700:2 at 10 billion CFU for 12 weeks in adults with metabolic syndromeRemnant cholesterol reduced by 0.16 mmol/L (95% CI 0.02-0.29) more than placebo at 12 weeks, correlating with improved endothelial functionRCTYang J, Huang J, Huang Z, et al. Cardiometabolic benefits of Lacticaseibacillus…

What else moves this marker

They describe those study groups, not an individual, and an association is not a cause.

Genetic predisposition

Each row is one study: what it compared and the change it reported in this marker.
WhatEffect on the markerComparison · populationSource
↑ GCKR rs1260326 (p.Pro446Leu) · CT or TT genotype vs CC genotype+0.07 mmol/LCT (46%) and TT (14%) vs CC (40%) genotype · General-population adults from Copenhagenprospective cohort · PMID 21071687
↑ TRIB1 rs2954029 · TA or AA genotype vs TT genotype+0.07 mmol/LTA (50%) and AA (27%) vs TT (23%) genotype · General-population adults from Copenhagenprospective cohort · PMID 21071687