PFLPhysiological Fitness Landscape

Biomarkers · Cardiac & Hemodynamics

Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS)

Lower values go with lower risk of death. Not measured in our NHANES panel. The curve is drawn from the published study (source below).

GLS and risk of death

Published curve higher than the NHANES fitNHANES fit higher

Risk of death relative to the curve's reference value, drawn from the published study (source below).

Published risk of death1.07×pooled minimally adjusted HR per unit strain (%) of GLS (worse strain) (95% CI 1.03–1.11) · Meta-analysis of community-dwelling/general-population speckle-tracking studies (8 papers, 11,744 individuals; 4 pooled)

What studies found when this marker was changed

They describe what happened in those study groups, not a recommendation. See all catalogued interventions.

Measured changes in GLS, study by study

3 effects with a numeric size, each from one study arm: the dot is the reported change, the line its 95% interval where one was given. Green points move the marker the way lower risk of death lies; amber the other way. Study results in the groups studied, not predictions for a person.

Each row is one study: what was changed, the effect it reported on this marker, and the source.
TypeInterventionReported effectEvidenceSource
pharmacologicSacubitril/valsartan titrated to 97/103 mg twice daily started with anthracycline chemotherapy and continued 18 months in women with early breast cancerGLS stable with sacubitril/valsartan (-0.3) but worsened 0.5 points with placebo; between-group difference -0.9 (95% CI -1.5 to -0.2) at 18 monthsRCTOmland T, Heck SL, Holte E, et al. Sacubitril/Valsartan and Prevention of…
pharmacologicPharmaceutical oral cannabidiol titrated to 10 mg/kg twice daily for 12 weeks within 10 days of CMR-confirmed acute myocarditis (ARCHER)No effect on CMR GLS at 12 weeks: -16.0% vs -15.9%, difference -0.1 (CI -1.2 to 1.1, P = .90); LV mass reduced 9.2 gRCTMcNamara DM, Cooper LT, Friedrich MG, et al. Impact of cannabidiol on…

Things that worsen it

Each row is one study: what was changed, the effect it reported on this marker, and the source.
TypeCondition or exposureReported effectEvidenceSource
pharmacologicSelf-administered anabolic-androgenic steroid use by male resistance-trained athletes, compared with non-using resistance-trained athletesGLS 3.34 points less negative (95% CI 2.93-3.76) in AAS users; LVEF -2.25%, LV mass +13.29 gmeta-analysisCavalcante DN, Romariz L, Neto A, et al. Anabolic-androgenic steroids on…

What else moves this marker

They describe those study groups, not an individual, and an association is not a cause.

Diseases and conditions

Each row is one study: what it compared and the change it reported in this marker.
WhatEffect on the markerComparison · populationSource
↑ Acromegaly · acromegaly patients with preserved LVEF vs healthy controls+1.6 %acromegaly (-17.5%) vs healthy controls (-19.1%) · 7 echocardiographic studies; 288 acromegaly patients, 294 healthy individualsmeta analysis · PMID 39242463
↑ Hypertension with concentric LV hypertrophy · hypertensive patients with concentric LVH vs normotensive controlsSMD +1.37 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.79)concentric LVH hypertensives vs normotensive controls · 8 studies; 267 normotensive controls, 712 hypertensives (205 concentric LVH)meta analysis · PMID 34128494
↑ Hypertension with eccentric LV hypertrophy · hypertensive patients with eccentric LVH vs normotensive controlsSMD +1.14 (95% CI 0.69 to 1.59)eccentric LVH hypertensives vs normotensive controls · 8 studies; 267 normotensive controls, 176 hypertensives with eccentric LVHmeta analysis · PMID 34128494
↑ Obesity · obese vs non-obese individuals without overt systolic dysfunctionSMD -0.86 (95% CI -1.02 to -0.69)obese vs non-obese · 24 speckle-tracking studies; 5792 obese and 5518 non-obese individualsmeta analysis · PMID 38780168
↑ Systemic hypertension · mostly uncomplicated hypertensive patients vs normotensive controlsSMD +1.07 (95% CI 0.77 to 1.36)hypertensive patients vs normotensive controls · 2D speckle-tracking studies; 2089 normotensive controls, 2187 hypertensive patientsmeta analysis · PMID 34054054