PFLPhysiological Fitness Landscape

Biomarkers · Cardiac & Hemodynamics

Carotid Intima-Media Thickness (CIMT)

Lower values go with lower risk of death. Not measured in our NHANES panel. The curve is drawn from the published study (source below).

CIMT and risk of death

Published curve higher than the NHANES fitNHANES fit higher

Risk of death relative to the curve's reference value, drawn from the published study (source below).

Published risk of death1.73×per 1-mm higher cIMT (95% CI 1.09–2.75) · Population-based sample (median age 53, 52% female) with carotid ultrasound at baseline

What studies found when this marker was changed

They describe what happened in those study groups, not a recommendation. See all catalogued interventions.

Measured changes in CIMT, study by study

1 effect with a numeric size, each from one study arm: the dot is the reported change, the line its 95% interval where one was given. Green points move the marker the way lower risk of death lies; amber the other way. Study results in the groups studied, not predictions for a person.

Each row is one study: what was changed, the effect it reported on this marker, and the source.
TypeInterventionReported effectEvidenceSource
dietTwo years on a low-fat, Mediterranean or low-carbohydrate weight-loss diet in moderately obese adults (DIRECT-Carotid)Mean CIMT change -1.1% (P=0.18) at 2 years; carotid vessel wall volume regressed 5% (-58.1 mm3)RCTShai I, et al. Circulation. 2010. Dietary intervention to reverse carotid…
pharmacologicOral 17beta-estradiol 1 mg/day (plus sequential vaginal progesterone if uterus) vs placebo for a median 5 years in healthy early postmenopausal women (ELITE)Slows CIMT progression: 0.0044 vs 0.0078 mm/year with placebo over a median 5 years in women less than 6 years past menopause (P=0.008)RCTHodis HN, et al. The New England journal of medicine. 2016. Vascular Effects of…

What else moves this marker

They describe those study groups, not an individual, and an association is not a cause.

Diseases and conditions

Each row is one study: what it compared and the change it reported in this marker.
WhatEffect on the markerComparison · populationSource
↑ Ankylosing spondylitis · patients with AS vs healthy controlsSMD +0.725 (95% CI 0.443 to 1.008)AS patients vs healthy controls · Adults with ankylosing spondylitis and healthy controls (24 studies)meta analysis · PMID 30089757
↑ Hyperuricemia · hyperuricemic adults vs normouricemic controlsSMD +0.264 (95% CI 0.161 to 0.366)hyperuricemia group vs control group · Adults with and without hyperuricemia (8 studies)meta analysis · PMID 33837500
↑ Psoriasis vulgaris · patients with psoriasis vs controls+0.17 mm (95% CI 0.12 to 0.22)psoriasis patients vs control groups, pooled mean difference · Adults with psoriasis vulgaris and controls (48 studies)meta analysis · PMID 39954202

Genetic predisposition

Each row is one study: what it compared and the change it reported in this marker.
WhatEffect on the markerComparison · populationSource
↓ APOE e2 allele (p.Arg176Cys) · e2 carriers vs non-carriers-1.4%APOE e2 carriers vs non-carriers · European- and African-ancestry adults with common carotid IMT by ultrasound, CHARGE Consortiummeta analysis · PMID 27872105

Environmental and occupational exposures

Each row is one study: what it compared and the change it reported in this marker.
WhatEffect on the markerComparison · populationSource
↓ Gestational organophosphate pesticide exposure (diethyl metabolites) · per one-interquartile-range increase in averaged maternal urinary sum-DEAP during pregnancy-0.14 child CIMT z-score per IQR increase in maternal urinary sum-DEAP per one-interquartile-range increase in averaged maternal urinary sum-DEAP during pregnancy (95% CI -0.25 to -0.02)higher vs lower prenatal diethyl phosphate metabolite concentrations · Mother-child pairs, Generation R Study, Rotterdam; children assessed at age 10prospective cohort · PMID 39447473
↓ Lactation duration (10+ months cumulative) · 10 or more months of lifetime lactation vs less than 1 month-0.029 mm10+ months vs 0 to <1 month of cumulative lactation, 20 years later · Women aged 18-30 at baseline, parous, free of heart disease and diabetes; CARDIA study (USA)prospective cohort · PMID 26241429