PFLPhysiological Fitness Landscape

Biomarkers · Vitamins & Endocrine

Serum Folate

Higher values go with lower risk of death. Not measured in our NHANES panel. The curve is drawn from the published study (source below).

Serum Folate and risk of death

Published curve higher than the NHANES fitNHANES fit higher

Risk of death relative to the curve's reference value, drawn from the published study (source below).

Published risk of death0.78×highest vs lowest quartile of serum folate (protective form as reported) (95% CI 0.69–0.88) · NHANES III U.S. adults, mortality via National Death Index to Dec 31, 2019

Serum Folate by age and sex

Each bar runs from the 5th to the 95th percentile, the darker part from the 25th to the 75th, and the tick is the median. Not a reference range or a target.

The percentiles as a table
Each row is one sex and age band: the values below which 5%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 95% of people fall (ng/mL), from the survey named in the row. Not a reference range or a target.
SexAge5th25thMedian75th95thnCycle / source
All20-395.969.8013.018.429.31,092NHANES 2017-2018
All40-596.0510.815.521.533.9954NHANES 2017-2018
All60+6.9312.319.730.749.9987NHANES 2017-2018
Allall6.2310.515.222.539.23,033NHANES 2017-2018
Men20-395.779.5512.716.825.3337NHANES 2017-2018
Men40-595.3010.314.719.528.3351NHANES 2017-2018
Men60+7.5911.919.327.545.1506NHANES 2017-2018
Menall6.0710.114.320.834.01,194NHANES 2017-2018
Women20-396.0610.113.920.531.7755NHANES 2017-2018
Women40-596.8411.016.723.937.6603NHANES 2017-2018
Women60+6.7612.420.533.651.7481NHANES 2017-2018
Womenall6.3610.916.524.442.11,839NHANES 2017-2018

What studies found when this marker was changed

They describe what happened in those study groups, not a recommendation. See all catalogued interventions.

Measured changes in Serum Folate, study by study

5 effects with a numeric size, each from one study arm: the dot is the reported change, the line its 95% interval where one was given. Green points move the marker the way lower risk of death lies; amber the other way. Study results in the groups studied, not predictions for a person.

Each row is one study: what was changed, the effect it reported on this marker, and the source.
TypeInterventionReported effectEvidenceSource
dietFolic acid-fortified maize porridge vs no intervention in pregnant women (Cochrane review)Plasma folate 6.611 ng/mL higher (95% CI 4.250 to 8.972; reported as 14.98 nmol/L) vs no intervention; duration not stated; 1 study, n=38systematic reviewCenteno Tablante E, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;7:CD012150.
dietRice fortified with iron plus folic acid and other micronutrients vs unfortified rice (Cochrane review)Serum/plasma folate 1.898 ng/mL higher (95% CI 0.8826 to 2.913; reported as 4.30 nmol/L) vs unfortified rice; duration not stated; 1 study, n=215systematic reviewPeña-Rosas JP, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;2019(10):CD009902.
environmentalPopulation-level mandatory folic acid fortification of wheat flour, maize flour or rice (pre- vs post-fortification meta-analysis)Serum/plasma folate 6.620 ng/mL higher (95% CI 4.148 to 9.047; reported as 15.0 nmol/L) after vs before mandatory fortification; duration not statedmeta-analysisParker J, et al. J Nutr. 2026;156(3):101291.
supplementDaily multivitamin/multimineral supplement for 16 weeks in adults aged 45-75 taking diuretics, metformin and/or proton pump inhibitors (double-blind RCT)Serum folate rose 7.5 ng/mL from baseline after 16 weeks of MVMS (placebo -1.6 ng/mL); 35 MVMS completersRCTChen O, et al. J Diet Suppl. 2022;19(1):20-33.
supplementOral folic acid 5 mg daily for 12 weeks vs placebo in middle-aged antidepressant-treated patients with low or marginal vitamin B-12 (FolATED trial)Serum folate 21.6 ng/mL higher (95% CI 8.13 to 25.02) vs placebo at 12 weeks (reported as μg/L, numerically identical); n=166RCTCarter B, et al. J Nutr. 2021;151(12):3738-3745.