PFLPhysiological Fitness Landscape

Biomarkers · Cardiac & Hemodynamics

Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)

Both low and high values go with higher risk of death. In NHANES 1999–2018 with linked mortality to 2019, each standard deviation above average goes with 4% lower risk of death. Risk rises at both ends: not comparable

DBP and risk of death

NHANES, our fit with 95% CIPublished curve

Published curve higher than the NHANES fitNHANES fit higher

Risk of death relative to each curve's own reference value, so the two curves need not cross 1 at the same point. The dotted vertical line marks the NHANES median.

Risk of death per SD (NHANES)0.96×95% CI 0.94–0.98 · 49,318 adults, 7,264 deaths
Published risk of death2.16×DBP >=110 mmHg vs 70-79 mmHg (reference) (95% CI 1.09–4.31) · Nationally representative sample of community-dwelling older adults (60-97 y) in Singapore, BP measured 2009, mortality to end-2015
Value of the measurement+0.007gain in concordance within age bands; rank 46 of 56 · all tests

DBP across cohorts

0.911.1HR per SD (95% CI)
NHANES · United States, 20–8449,318 people · 7,264 deaths0.96 0.94–0.98
CRELES · Costa Rica, 60+2,602 people · 502 deaths0.95 0.85–1.07
HRS · United States, 50+24,148 people · 8,515 deaths1.00 0.98–1.03
CHARLS · China, 50+10,447 people · 1,715 deaths1.10 1.01–1.19
Risk-of-death ratio per standard deviation, adjusted for age and sex, within each cohort. Cohorts differ in age range, assay, measurement protocol and follow-up, and one SD is a different amount in each, so the comparison is of direction and rough size per SD, not per unit. Vertical line: no association.

DBP by age and sex

Each bar runs from the 5th to the 95th percentile, the darker part from the 25th to the 75th, and the tick is the median. Not a reference range or a target.

The percentiles as a table
Each row is one sex and age band: the values below which 5%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 95% of people fall (mmHg), from the survey named in the row. Not a reference range or a target.
SexAge5th25thMedian75th95thnCycle / source
All20-3954.764.770.777.390.31,449NHANES 2017-2018
All40-5960.070.076.083.394.01,576NHANES 2017-2018
All60+49.563.370.777.388.71,923NHANES 2017-2018
Allall54.765.372.779.392.04,948NHANES 2017-2018
Men20-3955.466.073.380.093.3704NHANES 2017-2018
Men40-5962.772.077.386.095.3744NHANES 2017-2018
Men60+52.764.771.578.790.7980NHANES 2017-2018
Menall56.067.374.781.394.02,428NHANES 2017-2018
Women20-3954.062.768.774.784.0745NHANES 2017-2018
Women40-5957.768.075.381.392.7832NHANES 2017-2018
Women60+48.062.068.776.786.7943NHANES 2017-2018
Womenall53.364.070.777.388.72,520NHANES 2017-2018

What studies found when this marker was changed

They describe what happened in those study groups, not a recommendation. See all catalogued interventions.

Measured changes in DBP, study by study

7 effects with a numeric size, each from one study arm: the dot is the reported change, the line its 95% interval where one was given. Study results in the groups studied, not predictions for a person.

Each row is one study: what was changed, the effect it reported on this marker, and the source.
TypeInterventionReported effectEvidenceSource
behavioralDevice-guided slow breathing (10 min daily for 8 weeks) in uncontrolled hypertensionClinic BP change -7.5/-4.0 mm Hg with guided breathing vs -2.9/-1.5 mm Hg control (significance reported for systolic only)RCTGrossman E, et al. J Hum Hypertens. 2001;15:263-269.
dietDietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension eating pattern (fruit, vegetables, low-fat dairy, reduced saturated fat) followed daily; adults with and without hypertensionLowers DBP by 2.5 mmHg (95% CI -3.5 to -1.5) and SBP by 3.2 mmHg vs a control dietmeta-analysisFilippou CD, et al. Adv Nutr. 2020. Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension…
dietDaily cocoa extract or >=70% cocoa dark chocolate for at least 4 weeks in adults with or without comorbiditiesLowers DBP by 1.58 mmHg (95% CI -2.54 to -0.62) and SBP by 2.52 mmHg with >=4 weeks of cocoameta-analysisArisi TOP, et al. Nutrients. 2024. Effects of Cocoa Consumption on…
exerciseWeight reduction via energy restriction, increased physical activity, or bothDBP -3.57 mm Hg for net weight loss of -5.1 kg; -5.12 mm Hg in populations losing >5 kgmeta-analysisNeter JE, et al. Hypertension. 2003;42:878-884.
exerciseSupervised or home-based endurance exercise training for at least 4 weeks in healthy adultsEndurance training lowers resting DBP by 2.5 mmHg (95% CI -3.2 to -1.7); -5.2 mmHg in hypertensive subgroupsmeta-analysisCornelissen VA, Smart NA. Exercise training for blood pressure: a systematic…
exerciseIsometric resistance training (e.g. handgrip or wall squat holds) in adults with hypertension versus sedentary or sham controlLowers office DBP by 3.17 mmHg (95% CI -5.29 to -1.04) and SBP by 7.47 mmHg in people with hypertensionmeta-analysisBaffour-Awuah B, Pearson MJ, Dieberg G, et al. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2023.
pharmacologicCalcium channel blockers (Amlodipine 5-10 mg) / ACE inhibitorsEach drug class (incl. CCB, ACEi) lowered DBP 5.5 mm Hg at standard dose (placebo-adjusted); three half-dose drugs est. 11 mm Hgmeta-analysisLaw MR, et al. Value of low dose combination treatment with blood pressure…

Things that worsen it

Each row is one study: what was changed, the effect it reported on this marker, and the source.
TypeCondition or exposureReported effectEvidenceSource
pharmacologicExcessive over-titration of multi-agent vasodilators causing DBP < 55 mmHgJ-shaped risk with on-treatment DBP (nadir 119/84 mm Hg); low DBP increased death and MI in 22 576 hypertensive CAD patientscohortMesserli FH, et al. Dogma disputed: can aggressively lowering blood pressure in…

What else moves this marker

They describe those study groups, not an individual, and an association is not a cause.

Diseases and conditions

Each row is one study: what it compared and the change it reported in this marker.
WhatEffect on the markerComparison · populationSource
↑ Periodontitis · patients with periodontitis vs periodontally healthy+2.03 mmHg (95% CI 1.25 to 2.81)periodontitis vs non-periodontitis · Adults in 40 studies pooled from 81 selected studiesmeta analysis · PMID 31549149

Genetic predisposition

Each row is one study: what it compared and the change it reported in this marker.
WhatEffect on the markerComparison · populationSource
↓ SLC39A8 rs13107325 · per minor allele, UK Biobank participants of European ancestry-0.531 mmHg (beta per allele; units not reported) per alleleper copy of the rs13107325 minor allele · 276,436 UK Biobank participants of Caucasian genetic ancestry, no genetic kinshipcross sectional · PMID 41097109

Environmental and occupational exposures

Each row is one study: what it compared and the change it reported in this marker.
WhatEffect on the markerComparison · populationSource
↑ Acute alcohol, high dose (>30 g), 13-24 hours after · single high dose vs placebo, >=13 h after consumption+2.4 mmHg (95% CI 0.2 to 4.5)>30 g alcohol vs placebo, >=13 hours after consumption · 154 mostly healthy adults in 4 randomised trialsmeta analysis · PMID 32609894
↓ Acute alcohol, medium dose (14-28 g), within 6 hours · single dose vs placebo, 0-6 h after consumption-4 mmHg (95% CI -6 to -2)14-28 g alcohol vs placebo within 6 hours · 149 mostly healthy adults (mean age 33 y, predominantly male) in 10 randomised trialsmeta analysis · PMID 32609894
↑ Acute e-cigarette use · acute vaping vs non-use+7.676 mmHgacute e-cigarette exposure vs non-use · Human studies of acute e-cigarette exposure (12 studies meta-analysed of 63 reviewed)meta analysis · PMID 40010935
↑ Maternal smoking during pregnancy (moderate-heavy, continuous) · newborn girls, moderate-high continuous maternal smoking vs none+2.9 mmHg (95% CI 0.72 to 5.02)moderate-high continuous maternal smoking vs no smoking, female newborns · 6985 mother-infant dyads from Northern Plains (USA) and Cape Town (South Africa); measurements 12-96 h after deliveryprospective cohort · PMID 35440768