PFLPhysiological Fitness Landscape

Biomarkers · Anthropometric

Standing Height

Higher values go with lower risk of death. In NHANES 1999–2018 with linked mortality to 2019, each standard deviation above average goes with 1% higher risk of death. No clear pattern in NHANES

Standing Height and risk of death

NHANES, our fit with 95% CIPublished curve

Published curve higher than the NHANES fitNHANES fit higher

Risk of death relative to each curve's own reference value, so the two curves need not cross 1 at the same point. The dotted vertical line marks the NHANES median.

Risk of death per SD (NHANES)1.01×95% CI 0.97–1.04 · 50,921 adults, 7,362 deaths
Published risk of death0.97×per 6.5 cm greater height (95% CI 0.96–0.99) · Individual-participant meta-analysis of 121 prospective studies (n=1,085,949), Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration
Value of the measurement+0.001gain in concordance within age bands; rank 56 of 56 · all tests

Standing Height across cohorts

0.750.80.91HR per SD (95% CI)
NHANES · United States, 20–8450,921 people · 7,362 deaths1.01 0.97–1.04
HRS · United States, 50+23,974 people · 8,340 deaths0.91 0.88–0.95
CHARLS · China, 50+10,402 people · 1,701 deaths0.86 0.77–0.95
Risk-of-death ratio per standard deviation, adjusted for age and sex, within each cohort. Cohorts differ in age range, assay, measurement protocol and follow-up, and one SD is a different amount in each, so the comparison is of direction and rough size per SD, not per unit. Vertical line: no association.

Standing Height by age and sex

Each bar runs from the 5th to the 95th percentile, the darker part from the 25th to the 75th, and the tick is the median. Not a reference range or a target.

The percentiles as a table
Each row is one sex and age band: the values below which 5%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 95% of people fall (cm), from the survey named in the row. Not a reference range or a target.
SexAge5th25thMedian75th95thnCycle / source
All20-391541621691761861,525NHANES 2017-2018
All40-591531611681761851,636NHANES 2017-2018
All60+1511581651731821,969NHANES 2017-2018
Allall1521601681751855,130NHANES 2017-2018
Men20-39165171176180188731NHANES 2017-2018
Men40-59164171176181188771NHANES 2017-2018
Men60+161169173178185998NHANES 2017-2018
Menall1631701751801882,500NHANES 2017-2018
Women20-39152158162167174794NHANES 2017-2018
Women40-59151157161166173865NHANES 2017-2018
Women60+148154158163170971NHANES 2017-2018
Womenall1501561611651722,630NHANES 2017-2018

What studies found when this marker was changed

They describe what happened in those study groups, not a recommendation. See all catalogued interventions.

Measured changes in Standing Height, study by study

3 effects with a numeric size, each from one study arm: the dot is the reported change, the line its 95% interval where one was given. Green points move the marker the way lower risk of death lies; amber the other way. Study results in the groups studied, not predictions for a person.

Each row is one study: what was changed, the effect it reported on this marker, and the source.
TypeInterventionReported effectEvidenceSource
pharmacologicOral oxandrolone added to growth hormone therapy for 3-7.6 years in girls with Turner syndrome aged up to 18Final adult height 2.7 cm greater (95% CI 1.3-4.1) with oxandrolone plus GH than GH alone (moderate-quality evidence)meta-analysisMohamed S, Alkofide H, Adi YA, et al. Oxandrolone for growth hormone-treated…
pharmacologicRecombinant growth hormone 0.1 mg/kg three times per week from age 5-12.5 until adult height in girls with Turner syndromeGrowth hormone raised adult height by 0.78 SD (about 5.0 cm) vs placebo; adding childhood ultra-low-dose oestrogen gave a further 2.1 cm (P=0.059)RCTRoss JL, Quigley CA, Cao D, et al. Growth hormone plus childhood low-dose…
pharmacologicDaily subcutaneous vosoritide 15 ug/kg for 3 years in children with achondroplasia (open-label phase 3 extension vs untreated external controls)Additional height gain of 5.75 cm (95% CI 4.93-6.57) over three years vs untreated children; annualized growth velocity +1.84 cm/year in boys and +1.44 in girlsnon-randomised trialSavarirayan R, Irving M, Wilcox WR, et al. Sustained growth-promoting effects…

Sources

Map Standing Height against another biomarker.

Related markers: Appendicular Lean Mass / Sarcopenia Index · Basal Metabolic Rate · Body Fat Percentage · Body Mass Index (BMI) · Body Weight · Calf Circumference · Fat Mass · Fat-Free Mass