PFLPhysiological Fitness Landscape

Biomarkers · Glycemic & Metabolic

Fasting Serum Insulin

The published study could not tell whether risk rises or falls: its 95% interval includes no change. In NHANES 1999–2018 with linked mortality to 2019, each standard deviation above average goes with 6% higher risk of death. We found the same pattern in NHANES

Fasting Serum Insulin and risk of death

Published curve higher than the NHANES fitNHANES fit higher

Risk of death from our NHANES fit, relative to its reference value. The dotted vertical line marks the NHANES median.

Risk of death per SD (NHANES)1.06×95% CI 1.03–1.10 · 23,305 adults, 3,435 deaths
Published risk of death1.13×highest vs lowest category of fasting insulin (95% CI 1.00–1.27) · Meta-analysis of 7 prospective observational studies of non-diabetic adults (n=26,976)
Value of the measurement+0.013gain in concordance within age bands; rank 28 of 56 · all tests

Fasting Serum Insulin by age and sex

Each bar runs from the 5th to the 95th percentile, the darker part from the 25th to the 75th, and the tick is the median. Not a reference range or a target.

The percentiles as a table
Each row is one sex and age band: the values below which 5%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 95% of people fall (uIU/mL), from the survey named in the row. Not a reference range or a target.
SexAge5th25thMedian75th95thnCycle / source
All20-393.055.458.8815.531.8699NHANES 2017-2018
All40-592.965.949.1015.233.2758NHANES 2017-2018
All60+4.216.679.9015.731.4909NHANES 2017-2018
Allall3.236.079.2615.431.72,366NHANES 2017-2018
Men20-392.864.927.8914.531.7327NHANES 2017-2018
Men40-593.406.209.2915.434.5361NHANES 2017-2018
Men60+4.387.2910.619.231.7459NHANES 2017-2018
Menall3.296.119.1315.832.91,147NHANES 2017-2018
Women20-393.316.019.7716.031.9372NHANES 2017-2018
Women40-592.675.858.8514.631.9397NHANES 2017-2018
Women60+3.976.239.4714.125.1450NHANES 2017-2018
Womenall3.236.029.3414.930.01,219NHANES 2017-2018

What studies found when this marker was changed

They describe what happened in those study groups, not a recommendation. See all catalogued interventions.

Measured changes in Fasting Serum Insulin, study by study

2 effects with a numeric size, each from one study arm: the dot is the reported change, the line its 95% interval where one was given. Study results in the groups studied, not predictions for a person.

Each row is one study: what was changed, the effect it reported on this marker, and the source.
TypeInterventionReported effectEvidenceSource
dietReduction of refined starches (energy-matched low-carbohydrate diet)Energy-matched low-carbohydrate diet lowered fasting insulin vs high-carbohydrate diet (Hedges' g - 0.190; 95% CI - 0.361 to - 0.014; 18 RCTs)meta-analysisAnagnostou A, et al. Effects of energy-matched low- versus high-carbohydrate…
dietIntermittent fasting (time-restricted feeding or intermittent energy restriction)Intermittent fasting significantly reduced fasting insulin in young adults (age-dependent; effect size not reported)meta-analysisXing K, et al. Age-Specific Analysis of the Effects of Intermittent Fasting on…
diet8-week DASH diet (52% carbohydrate, 18% protein, 30% fat, <2400 mg sodium, rich in fruit, vegetables, whole grains, low-fat dairy) in overweight/obese women with PCOSSerum insulin changed by -1.88 uIU/mL on DASH vs +2.89 uIU/mL on the control diet at 8 weeks (p=0.03)RCTAsemi Z, et al. Horm Metab Res. 2015. DASH diet, insulin resistance, and serum…
exerciseResistance trainingResistance training significantly reduced fasting insulin vs usual care in overweight/obese adults (RT-specific magnitude not reported)meta-analysisJiao B, et al. Exercise and Insulin-Resistance Biomarkers in Adults With…
supplementDaily probiotic capsule (Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei and Bifidobacterium bifidum, 2x10^9 CFU/g each) for 8 weeks in adults with major depressive disorderSerum insulin changed by -2.3 uIU/mL with probiotic vs +2.6 uIU/mL with placebo at 8 weeks (P = 0.03)RCTAkkasheh G, et al. Nutrition. 2016. Clinical and metabolic response to…