PFLPhysiological Fitness Landscape

Biomarkers · Electrolytes & Minerals

Serum Zinc

Higher values go with lower risk of death. Not measured in our NHANES panel. The curve is drawn from the published study (source below).

Serum Zinc and risk of death

Published curve higher than the NHANES fitNHANES fit higher

Risk of death relative to the curve's reference value, drawn from the published study (source below).

Published risk of death1.94×low serum zinc, men (category cut-offs and reference not reported) (95% CI 1.03–3.65) · Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study phase IV (2009-2011), adults aged >=30 without CVD; estimate is for men only (no association in women)

Serum Zinc by age and sex

Each bar runs from the 5th to the 95th percentile, the darker part from the 25th to the 75th, and the tick is the median. Not a reference range or a target.

The percentiles as a table
Each row is one sex and age band: the values below which 5%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 95% of people fall (ug/dL), from the survey named in the row. Not a reference range or a target.
SexAge5th25thMedian75th95thnCycle / source
All20-3957.067.879.591.0106578NHANES 2015-2016
All40-5962.671.781.290.1105567NHANES 2015-2016
All60+59.071.582.191.6105579NHANES 2015-2016
Allall59.170.981.190.81051,724NHANES 2015-2016
Men20-3958.472.885.593.8110291NHANES 2015-2016
Men40-5962.871.782.291.8107273NHANES 2015-2016
Men60+58.471.381.592.0111300NHANES 2015-2016
Menall60.471.782.892.7110864NHANES 2015-2016
Women20-3956.365.975.486.2102287NHANES 2015-2016
Women40-5960.571.480.689.596.8294NHANES 2015-2016
Women60+59.273.482.291.1102279NHANES 2015-2016
Womenall58.169.679.588.6102860NHANES 2015-2016

What studies found when this marker was changed

They describe what happened in those study groups, not a recommendation. See all catalogued interventions.

Measured changes in Serum Zinc, study by study

4 effects with a numeric size, each from one study arm: the dot is the reported change, the line its 95% interval where one was given. Green points move the marker the way lower risk of death lies; amber the other way. Study results in the groups studied, not predictions for a person.

Each row is one study: what was changed, the effect it reported on this marker, and the source.
TypeInterventionReported effectEvidenceSource
dietStaple foods fortified with zinc vs the same foods without added zinc (Cochrane review)Serum or plasma zinc rose 13.86 ug/dL (2.12 umol/L; 95% CI 1.25 to 3.00 umol/L) vs unfortified food; duration not stated; 3 studies, n=158meta-analysisShah D, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(6):CD010697.
supplementOral zinc supplementation vs placebo in adults with type 2 diabetes (dose-response meta-analysis of 22 RCTs)Serum zinc rose 15.38 ug/dL (95% CI 10.74 to 20.02) vs placebo; duration not stated; 22 RCTs, n=1442meta-analysisGhaedi K, et al. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2024;64(25):9228-9239.
supplementCombined zinc and vitamin A supplementation vs control in adults with sputum-positive pulmonary tuberculosisSerum zinc rose 5.623 ug/dL (0.86 umol/L; 95% CI 0.14 to 1.57 umol/L) vs control at 2 monthsmeta-analysisWagnew F, et al. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7(9):e008625.
supplementIncreased zinc intake (supplementation or diet) for at least 2 weeks in controlled studies of healthy participantsPlasma/serum zinc rose 14.19 ug/dL (2.17 umol/L; 95% CI 1.73 to 2.61 umol/L) with increased zinc intake in controlled studies; duration not statedmeta-analysisCeballos-Rasgado M, et al. Nutr Rev. 2025;83(3):e778-e800.