Biomarkers · Electrolytes & Minerals
Serum Zinc
Higher values go with lower risk of death. Not measured in our NHANES panel. The curve is drawn from the published study (source below).
Serum Zinc and risk of death
Published curve higher than the NHANES fitNHANES fit higher
Risk of death relative to the curve's reference value, drawn from the published study (source below).
Serum Zinc by age and sex
Each bar runs from the 5th to the 95th percentile, the darker part from the 25th to the 75th, and the tick is the median. Not a reference range or a target.
The percentiles as a table
| Sex | Age | 5th | 25th | Median | 75th | 95th | n | Cycle / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | 20-39 | 57.0 | 67.8 | 79.5 | 91.0 | 106 | 578 | NHANES 2015-2016 |
| All | 40-59 | 62.6 | 71.7 | 81.2 | 90.1 | 105 | 567 | NHANES 2015-2016 |
| All | 60+ | 59.0 | 71.5 | 82.1 | 91.6 | 105 | 579 | NHANES 2015-2016 |
| All | all | 59.1 | 70.9 | 81.1 | 90.8 | 105 | 1,724 | NHANES 2015-2016 |
| Men | 20-39 | 58.4 | 72.8 | 85.5 | 93.8 | 110 | 291 | NHANES 2015-2016 |
| Men | 40-59 | 62.8 | 71.7 | 82.2 | 91.8 | 107 | 273 | NHANES 2015-2016 |
| Men | 60+ | 58.4 | 71.3 | 81.5 | 92.0 | 111 | 300 | NHANES 2015-2016 |
| Men | all | 60.4 | 71.7 | 82.8 | 92.7 | 110 | 864 | NHANES 2015-2016 |
| Women | 20-39 | 56.3 | 65.9 | 75.4 | 86.2 | 102 | 287 | NHANES 2015-2016 |
| Women | 40-59 | 60.5 | 71.4 | 80.6 | 89.5 | 96.8 | 294 | NHANES 2015-2016 |
| Women | 60+ | 59.2 | 73.4 | 82.2 | 91.1 | 102 | 279 | NHANES 2015-2016 |
| Women | all | 58.1 | 69.6 | 79.5 | 88.6 | 102 | 860 | NHANES 2015-2016 |
What studies found when this marker was changed
They describe what happened in those study groups, not a recommendation. See all catalogued interventions.
Measured changes in Serum Zinc, study by study
4 effects with a numeric size, each from one study arm: the dot is the reported change, the line its 95% interval where one was given. Green points move the marker the way lower risk of death lies; amber the other way. Study results in the groups studied, not predictions for a person.
| Type | Intervention | Reported effect | Evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| diet | Staple foods fortified with zinc vs the same foods without added zinc (Cochrane review) | Serum or plasma zinc rose 13.86 ug/dL (2.12 umol/L; 95% CI 1.25 to 3.00 umol/L) vs unfortified food; duration not stated; 3 studies, n=158 | meta-analysis | Shah D, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(6):CD010697. |
| supplement | Oral zinc supplementation vs placebo in adults with type 2 diabetes (dose-response meta-analysis of 22 RCTs) | Serum zinc rose 15.38 ug/dL (95% CI 10.74 to 20.02) vs placebo; duration not stated; 22 RCTs, n=1442 | meta-analysis | Ghaedi K, et al. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2024;64(25):9228-9239. |
| supplement | Combined zinc and vitamin A supplementation vs control in adults with sputum-positive pulmonary tuberculosis | Serum zinc rose 5.623 ug/dL (0.86 umol/L; 95% CI 0.14 to 1.57 umol/L) vs control at 2 months | meta-analysis | Wagnew F, et al. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7(9):e008625. |
| supplement | Increased zinc intake (supplementation or diet) for at least 2 weeks in controlled studies of healthy participants | Plasma/serum zinc rose 14.19 ug/dL (2.17 umol/L; 95% CI 1.73 to 2.61 umol/L) with increased zinc intake in controlled studies; duration not stated | meta-analysis | Ceballos-Rasgado M, et al. Nutr Rev. 2025;83(3):e778-e800. |
Sources
- Risk curve: Ghafouri-Taleghani F 2026 (PMID 42262457): all-cause HR 1.94 (1.03-3.65) low serum zinc, men (category cut-offs and reference not reported). Scaled to published population values.
- Ghafouri-Taleghani F, Bahadoran Z, Azizi F. Sex-Specific Prospective Association of Serum Zinc Concentration with Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality: A 10-Year Population-Based Cohort Study. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2026;19(1):69..
Map Serum Zinc against another biomarker.
Related markers: Albumin-Adjusted Anion Gap · Blood Lead · Serum Bicarbonate · Serum Calcium · Serum Chloride · Serum Magnesium · Serum Phosphate · Serum Potassium