PFLPhysiological Fitness Landscape

Biomarkers · Functional Fitness

Vertical Jump Height

No risk curve catalogued yet.

What studies found when this marker was changed

They describe what happened in those study groups, not a recommendation. See all catalogued interventions.

Measured changes in Vertical Jump Height, study by study

5 effects with a numeric size, each from one study arm: the dot is the reported change, the line its 95% interval where one was given. Study results in the groups studied, not predictions for a person.

Each row is one study: what was changed, the effect it reported on this marker, and the source.
TypeInterventionReported effectEvidenceSource
exerciseWeight resistance training programmes in healthy athletes compared with routine trainingVertical jump +9.9 cm (95% CI 6.7-13.5) vs routine training; countermovement jump +2.2 cmmeta-analysisMa S, et al. J Sports Sci Med. 2025. Effects of Physical Training Programs on…
exercisePlyometric training programmes in healthy individuals (26 controlled trials)Countermovement jump height +8.7% (95% CI 7.0-10.4); squat jump +4.7%, CMJ with arm swing +7.5%, drop jump +4.7%meta-analysisMarkovic G. Br J Sports Med. 2007. Does plyometric training improve vertical…
exerciseTraining programmes including Olympic weightlifting exercises for >=6 weeks in resistance-trained sportspeopleVertical jump +7.7% vs control (ES 0.62); +5.1% vs traditional resistance training; no difference vs plyometricsmeta-analysisHackett D, et al. Br J Sports Med. 2016. Olympic weightlifting training…
supplementCreatine monohydrate 3 x 10 g daily for 7 days in young male soccer playersVertical jump height 49.2 to 55.1 cm after 7 days of creatine (p < .05); superior to placebo post-supplementationRCTOstojic SM. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2004. Creatine supplementation in…